
Issue #1198: OP_CTV and rough consensus
I am in favor of murky rough consensus driving protocol changes over a well defined process that could potentially be socially attacked.
I am in favor of murky rough consensus driving protocol changes over a well defined process that could potentially be socially attacked.
We'll be keeping you freaks abreast of the progress of payment pools as more information comes in.
Don't sleep on the Bitcoin developer community.
Solutions seems to be out there. If they aren't, I am confident they will materialize.
And the haters will tell you Bitcoin development is stagnant. LOL!
Truly smart contracts and DeFi brought to Bitcoin. Done correctly with minimalist design that doesn't rely on a 3rd party oracle. Bitcoin is the oracle. The haters are in disbelief!
All things that, when combined, would make Bitcoin more efficient, more programmable, and easier to secure. Wins all around.
To pull this off, Binance would have needed to coordinate with miners to rewrite the chain to change the transaction executed by the hacker. Now, that doesn't seem very decentralized or trustless, does it? Nor does it seem very practical.